A laboratory alloy report describes the submitted sample. To use it for a solder-pot decision, connect that sample to the correct machine and production state. A well-measured specimen with an uncertain sampling history cannot reliably explain what contacted the boards under investigation.
Identify the bath and the question
Record the machine, pot, intended alloy and relevant production interval. State whether the analysis supports routine monitoring, a suspected contamination event or a proposed replenishment decision. Keep separate pots and selective-solder modules distinguishable even when they use the same nominal alloy.
Kester’s solder-sampling instruction distinguishes wave and selective-solder equipment and defines preparation before collection. Use the applicable supplier and equipment procedure with trained personnel; the sampling state is part of what makes the analysis representative.
Keep the sample linked to bath history
| Record | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Sample identifier | Links the laboratory result to the physical specimen |
| Machine and pot | Identifies the production solder source |
| Collection time | Places the sample among production and maintenance events |
| Recent additions | Shows material changes before collection |
| Sampling procedure | Defines the represented operating condition |
Label the container before the sample leaves the workstation. A handwritten alloy name alone is insufficient when several machines are sampled together.
Interpret the report against the actual alloy
Use the material supplier’s current composition requirements and the agreed process limits. Distinguish intended alloying elements from unwanted contamination. Do not apply one alloy’s control limit or replenishment advice to a different composition.
For example, a sample collected after a replenishment event may not represent boards soldered before that event. Keep the timeline explicit when deciding which production interval the result can support.
Review unexplained results with the laboratory and process owner, including units, sample identity and method capability. Recollect using the approved procedure if representativeness is uncertain rather than immediately changing the bath.
When several samples are collected in one session, keep their tools and containers identified under the approved procedure. The report should not depend on an operator later remembering which cooled sample came from which selective-solder module.
Make a controlled process decision
Any adjustment, partial replacement or other corrective action should follow the approved alloy and equipment guidance. Record the action and the verification sample as separate events. Do not erase the original out-of-condition result from the history.
Connect the analysis with relevant soldering observations, but avoid claiming that one composition result proves every cause of poor hole fill or wetting.
The solderability guide addresses the surface being joined, while nozzle maintenance review covers another process condition that can affect selective soldering.
Move from reading to a build-ready project
Use the fabrication and assembly checklists to prepare drawings, production files and test requirements.
Open the DFM checklist