Using stock codes only
Keep manufacturer and exact ordering code.
Build a consistent data package before requesting an assembly quote.
A PCB assembly package connects the physical board to its components, placements and acceptance instructions. The essential issue is consistency: BOM, placement file, assembly drawing, board data and firmware must describe the same revision and population variant. Part numbers alone cannot resolve an ambiguous polarity drawing. Use a file manifest and release note to identify the authoritative documents, approved alternatives and decisions still requiring engineering approval.
List manufacturer names and full manufacturer part numbers rather than distributor codes alone. Reconcile quantities with reference designators and mark do-not-populate rules. Ratings and package descriptions help find inconsistencies, but do not replace exact ordering codes. Where alternates are permitted, identify the approved part and who authorizes any additional substitution before it enters the build.
State units, board side and origin for the placement export. Verify several asymmetric parts against the drawing and footprint. Rotation conventions differ, so a numerical angle is not sufficient proof of orientation. Include pin-one and polarity indicators where the assembled body hides the silkscreen, and flag any package whose convention needs explicit review.
Include hand-soldered connectors, adhesives, mechanical hardware, heatsinks, labels and programming. Assign responsibility for supplied materials and each operation. Functional instructions need safe input limits, expected outputs and pass criteria. When programming is required, provide the controlled image and its identity rather than a link to a folder that can change without a release record.
List file names, purpose and revision in a short manifest. Remove superseded variants from the released archive while retaining them in your own history. Ask reviewers to identify discrepancies by reference designator or document location. Issue a new release identifier for corrected data so a late attachment cannot silently replace only part of the approved package. For example, a second product variant may use the same bare board but omit a sensor, fit a different resistor network and load different firmware. A separate variant identifier should connect all three differences. Check that placement data, labels and test expectations agree with that identifier. A reviewer should be able to reconstruct the intended assembly from the release package without searching through previous emails or inferring which version the latest spreadsheet represents.
| Choice or scope | Useful when | Review before release |
|---|---|---|
| BOM | What to buy and fit | MPNs, references and variants |
| Placement file | Automated component location | Units, origin, side and rotation |
| Assembly drawing | Orientation and exceptions | Polarity and mechanical notes |
| Board package | Bare-board construction | Matching revision |
| Programming/test files | Functional configuration | Image identity and limits |
Keep manufacturer and exact ordering code.
Put population rules in controlled documents.
Release one manifest and one authoritative package.
They describe board artwork, not the complete assembly. Supply component identity, placement, orientation and the additional mechanical or test instructions. Confirm accepted export formats and the data needed for the actual operations in your quotation.
Give exact manufacturer part numbers and the affected reference designators. State conditions and approval restrictions. A phrase such as equivalent acceptable leaves electrical and mechanical decisions unresolved and can make a later substitution hard to trace.
Assign each variant an identifier and explicit population rules. Confirm whether the bare board is identical, then align firmware, labels and test instructions with the correct variant. Do not use an unmarked combined BOM as the only configuration record.
Check each source’s scope and revision against your project requirements. Confirm the proposed construction with your manufacturing partner.
Identify gaps in the assembly release package. This tool plans a review; it does not inspect uploaded CAD files.
Use this planning aid to prepare a review. It does not approve a design or estimate a price. Selections are processed locally and are not submitted by this tool.
Paste CSV columns for MPN, Quantity and References. This local check finds missing values, duplicate reference designators and quantity inconsistencies. It does not check component availability, authenticity or whether a selected part fits your design.
Your CSV is processed locally. It is not sent to Swimbi or stored by this tool.
Move from a finished layout to a fabrication-ready board with a clear specification, controlled revisions and a practical production plan.
Explore details02 / ServicesBring bare boards, components, assembly data and test requirements together in one well-defined build package.
Explore details03 / ContactTell us what you are building. Include your board requirements, quantity and target timing.
Explore details